Wellness Programs : Does Value-Based Health Care Save Money?

In a value-based plan, the idea is to reward staff members for seeking treatments that promote wellness.

The more clinically viable the treatment, the less an employee pays out of pocket for it.

Example –  Women over 40 and younger staff members with a family history of breast cancer pay less for a annually mammogram than staff members for whom the test isn’t as necessary.

Value-based plans often work better than high-deductible plans when used in combination with standard health promotion program features like health risk assessments.

Five target areas

As reported by the May 2008 issue of Simply Well, there are four quality-of-care criteria that have emerged as key benchmarks of the quality of care – health care management, preventive screenings and treatments, member service and access to care.

Areas of care that are of particular concern –

• Employees’ dependents receiving appropriate and timely childhood/adolescent immunizations

• Breast cancer screenings for female health plan enrollees, ages 52 to 64

• Diabetic workers receiving hemoglobin A1C and LDL-C testing

• Members receiving proper referrals and treatment for psychological health issues (e.g., primary care doctor refers a patient to a specialist to ensure proper prescription and management of an anti-depressant medication)

• Pregnant workforce receivig time and appropriate prenatal and postpartum care, and avoidance of antibiotic treatment in adults with acute bronchitis.

The quality of care for a lot of of the aforementioned issues can suffer when employees foot too much of the bill out of their own pockets.

The hope for value-based plans is that workers get some cost relief and obtain treatments that’ll reduce costs in the long run.

This entry was posted on Thursday, August 26th, 2010 at 9:27 am and is filed under Employee Wellness, Wellness Programs. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply